Car Rental Q&A: Can The Big Koenig Loss-Of-Use Case Win In Colorado Benefit Me In Washington State?

Q: I have heard about the Koenig case being a big deal for the industry. Since that was in Colorado, how does it help me in Washington?

— Perry Roper — Hertz licensee, Pasco, Wash.

A: This is a great question — no matter what state you live in. Colorado created a favorable “precedent” for loss of use and administrative fees in the car rental industry (the law of the land).

The 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals’ first decision upheld reasonable administrative fees. The second Colorado Supreme Court decision established loss of use regardless of any fleet utilization.
To use Koenig, you will want to use proper citation, meaning quoting it properly:

On administrative fees:

PurCo v. Koenig, 240 P.3d 435 (Colo.App.Div. 3 2010) (“...the [administrative] fee should be ‘reasonable’”) aff’d. oth. grnds. Co. Sup. Ct., Koenig v. PurCo, 285 P.3d 979 (Colo. 2012)

On loss of use:

Koenig v. PurCo, 285 P.3d 979 (Colo. 2012) (“National [now PurCo] must be compensated for any ‘loss of use ... regardless of fleet utilization ...’ [i]n sum, we hold that the reasonable rental value of a chattel or, alternatively, net lost profits ... approximate loss of use damages. Plaintiffs may elect which measure of recovery to pursue, but either makes them whole.”)

For special circumstances, even stronger language:

Koenig v. PurCo, 285 P.3d 979 (Colo. 2012) (“If the [proposition] were correct that a commercial entity must prove a lost opportunity to recover loss of use damages, then anyone could wrongfully take possession of a commercially owned or leased chattel and eventually return it in a similar condition without liability unless the owner could prove a lost economic opportunity or lost profits. We find this position untenable.”)

But can you use it in your own jurisdiction? Certainly. It is a bit tricky, but not too difficult. Nowhere does any state law require you to prove all your cars were rented in order to recover lost use. But now there is state law (in Colorado) that says you don’t have to prove it.

The Colorado precedent can be used very effectively with a little key principle that attorneys use called “persuasive authority.” When there is an unanswered question in any court, you can “persuade” your judge to follow another jurisdiction. There is a rule on loss of use and administrative fees in first party or third party property damage claims called “common law tort” (damage done) case precedent in every state. Simply stated, a responsible party (“tortfeasor”) must put the injured party into the position as if the incident had never happened.

Someone in the insurance industry (I’m sure someone is still patting him or herself on the back) had an idea: “at-fault” parties feel like they’re getting robbed if they pay damage claim estimates on property (“chattels”) never repaired. Those tortfeasors want payment to actually go to repairs. 

CONTINUED:  Car Rental Q&A: Can The Big Koenig Loss-Of-Use Case Win In Colorado Benefit Me In Washington State?
« Previous  |  1  2  |  Next »

Comment On This Story

Name:  
Email:  
Comment: (Max. 10000 characters)  
Please leave blank:
* Please note that every comment is moderated.

Newsletter: Sign up to receive latest news, articles, and much more.

Read the latest

Auto Focus Blog: A blog covering fleets, auto rental and the business of cars

The Customer Isn’t Always Right

Not caving to a customer with a blatant agenda may have consequences, especially for a small rental company that relies on stellar Yelp ratings to advertise. But business integrity must prevail.

The Truth Behind Compact Van Depreciation

Why are large van values holding up better than their compact counterparts, and will it last?

Car Rental’s Call to Action on Autonomous Vehicles

The car rental industry has built-in advantages to support a world with driverless cars, but it needs to take the next step in partnering with autonomous vehicle stakeholders.

Job Finder: Access Top Talent. Fill Key Positions.