U.S. Appeals Court Says Insurer Must Pay in Geico v. Garcia, Sends Case Back

The 11th circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled on Jan. 9 that in Garcia v. Geico General Insurance Co., the insurance company is still responsible for coverages in a fatal collision involving one of its customers, even though the customer was not the original renter of the vehicle from Enterprise Rent-A-Car.

The decision reversed and remanded a district court decision that said Geico was not responsible, which means the case will return to the district court so that a judgment can be recorded.

The Appeals Court ruled in precedence to a recent case in Florida, Chandler v. Geico Indemnity Co., outlining that even though the driver may not have had direct permission to drive the vehicle directly from the “owner” — in these cases the car rental companies — the insurance company must still insure the vehicle.

The difference between the two cases is that in Chandler v. Geico, the original renter’s insurance company was considered responsible for coverages; however, in Garcia v. Geico, the original renter did not have insurance, nor did he purchase liability insurance through Enterprise. The driver at the time of crash, on the other hand, did have insurance, and under his policy with Geico, coverages included those for a “non-owned auto,” which in this case was the rental car.

Geico claimed, as it did in the Chandler case, that because express permission wasn’t given by the car rental company that it did not have to insure the vehicle. “Chandler instructs that the broad definition of ‘permission’ developed in Florida’s dangerous instrumentality cases is applicable to contractual insurance disputes, such as the one at hand,” said the official court opinion, adding that the district court did not apply the correct definition of “permission.”

For the original court opinion, click on the URL: http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/unpub/ops/201012825.pdf


  1. Sl [ January 18, 2012 @ 11:54AM ]

    A little unclear in the headline, but if I understand this correctly the non-authorized driver's insurance is being required to provide coverage? If so, a good ruling.

Comment On This Story

Comment: (Max. 10000 characters)  
Please leave blank:
* Please note that every comment is moderated.


Newsletter: Sign up to receive latest news, articles, and much more.

Read the latest

Auto Focus Blog: A blog covering fleets, auto rental and the business of cars

Trends Moving the Truck Market

Storylines that emerged from the 2018 Work Truck Show include the increasing need for on-site productivity, inclusion of active safety systems in trucks, DPF frustrations affecting product decisions, data management, and the growing link between fleet management and company revenue.

MIT Study Reinforces the Newfound Importance of Fleet

Uber and Lyft drivers make far less when factoring vehicle expenses, though the actual numbers are now in dispute. A proper lifecycle cost analysis would’ve helped, and shows the benefit of collaboration with fleet professionals.

What a Connected Fleet Means to Avis (and Car Rental)

Counter bypass is just the beginning. The promise of a “data-driven ecosystem” that connects renters with the rental agency, retail services, and even the city is a better managed fleet, an improved user experience, and new revenue opportunities during the rental itself.

Job Finder: Access Top Talent. Fill Key Positions.