San Francisco Sues Hertz for Charging High Toll Fees

The lawsuit is involving toll fees that were charged to Hertz customers when crossing San Francisco's Golden Gate Bridge. Photo via Wikimedia/Rich Niewiroski Jr.,
The lawsuit is involving toll fees that were charged to Hertz customers when crossing San Francisco's Golden Gate Bridge. Photo via Wikimedia/Rich Niewiroski Jr.,

City Attorney Dennis Herrera has sued the Hertz Corp. and its business partner American Traffic Solutions Inc. for misleading customers and engaging in unlawful, unfair, and fraudulent business practices, according to a report by the City Attorney of San Francisco website.

The lawsuit alleges that the car rental company was charging steep toll fees to rental car customers who crossed the Golden Gate Bridge. According to the lawsuit that Herrera filed on March 1 in San Francisco Superior Court (People of the State of California v. The Hertz Corporation), Hertz fraudulently induced its customers to purchase an “optional” tool service called PlatePass for crossing the Golden Gate Bridge.

On other California toll bridges, PlatePass is a service that permits Hertz customers to bypass cash toll lanes and use the electronic FasTrak lanes without having to create a FasTrak account.

But on the Golden Gate Bridge, which went cashless four years ago, Hertz customers allegedly neither choose the service nor receive sufficient notice to avoid it, according to the report.

By driving over the Golden Gate Bridge one time, Hertz customers were charged not only the undiscounted toll rate of $7.50 but also up to $24.75 in extra fees, says the report. That means that many customers paid a $32.35 bill to cross the bridge once, which is more than four times the toll rate.

Additionally, Hertz allegedly doesn’t charge and disclose these fees on the receipt it provides to customers at checkout. According to the report, Hertz supposedly provides its customers’ personal credit card information to a third party who slips in the charge later.

The lawsuit alleges that the Hertz Corp. and American Traffic Solutions Inc. engage in false advertising and unlawful business practices in violation of several state and federal consumer protection laws.

Herrera’s lawsuit seeks a court order halting these deceptive practices, restitution (with interest) to victims, and civil penalties of up to $2,500 against each defendant for each unlawful act.


  1. Casey [ March 22, 2017 @ 11:51AM ]

    Customers are willing to pay for convenience; especially when it frees up the stress of planning, and organizing "stuff". Charging a markup on tolls is totally fine, but be honest about it. Charging for tolls that have ceased to be tolls is outright criminal and immoral. I hope everyone that paid this toll will be made away of this. Ill be sharing on my FB and LinkedIN accounts

Comment On This Story

Comment: (Max. 10000 characters)  
Please leave blank:
* Please note that every comment is moderated.


Newsletter: Sign up to receive latest news, articles, and much more.

Read the latest

Auto Focus Blog: A blog covering fleets, auto rental and the business of cars

What a Connected Fleet Means to Avis (and Car Rental)

Counter bypass is just the beginning. The promise of a “data-driven ecosystem” that connects renters with the rental agency, retail services, and even the city is a better managed fleet, an improved user experience, and new revenue opportunities during the rental itself.

Should Peer-to-Peer Renters Pay Airport Car Rental Fees?

The question is central to the City of San Francisco’s lawsuit against Turo for operating without a permit at San Francisco International Airport.

Hard Times Ahead for the Compact SUV Segment?

The hottest segment today is facing a glut of models and volume in tomorrow’s wholesale market.

Job Finder: Access Top Talent. Fill Key Positions.