The omnipresence of smart phones, sparring between the airlines and online travel agencies, the push to lower GDS costs and potential car rental company consolidations are all driving change in the world of travel reservations.
What lies on the horizon for car rental?
Auto Rental News interviewed Mark E. Walker to get his take on the changing online reservations landscape. A former co-owner of Advantage Rent-A-Car and a car rental industry veteran of more than 30 years, Walker recently co-founded NÜ Car Rentals, which operates an affiliate car rental network in more than 25 countries.
ARN: American Airlines (AA) no longer lists fares on Expedia and Orbitz. Is the balance of power shifting away from the travel portals to the airline, hotel and car rental suppliers?
MEW: In terms of the AA fare delisting, it's unlikely we'll see a similar shift in the car rental industry, for a few reasons: You need very unique content and/or a loyal customer base to walk away from the business that large travel portals control. Several hotel chains have tried, but most came back. Enterprise has not been on Orbitz for a number of years now, but Alamo and National still are. Dollar and Thrifty dropped their preferred status on Expedia in 2005 but changed position within a year. Big airlines have a more powerful position than even the largest car rental companies, and yet AA has received a lot of pushback for the move. Southwest Airlines is the best example of a travel company that has taken a truly hard stance and stuck with it.
I think with AA, it is more of a case of desperate times call for desperate measures, especially after the specter of airline bankruptcies. AA does not want to lose the exposure and bookings they get from the travel portals, its goal is to eliminate the associated GDS (Global Distribution System) costs by using direct connect technology.
ARN: So what is "direct connect?"
MEW: Direct connect is a term used to describe a "direct connection" of real-time information between the supplier's reservation system and the travel portal, in lieu of going through a GDS. Direct connect is not new, unproven proprietary technology. One of the mandates of the OpenTravel Alliance, formed in 1999, is to create standards to facilitate that connectivity as new interfaces are built.
ARN: Then what's the problem? Wouldn't a direct connection be preferable, at least for the travel portal and the supplier?
MEW: A lot of the fees that suppliers pay to the GDSes get rebated back to the originator of the reservations, either a travel agency or a travel portal. So the GDS's provide a lot of financial incentive to avoid using direct connections.
Additionally, these GDS connections are already established, while to establish and maintain direct connections with numerous suppliers takes a lot of investment dollars. GDS messaging is complex and expensive, but the bottom line is that it works and handles millions of rate quotes and reservations per day.
If you are a travel portal and have established connectivity and a nice revenue sharing agreement with a GDS, you probably are not in a big hurry to change this.
ARN: Is consolidation in car rental shifting this balance of power? Are the major RACs trying to push more customers to their own Web sites to make reservations?
MEW: Yes, consolidation definitely gives the major car rental companies more negotiating power, but it can also open doors for smaller companies. The consumer might see the top nine brands listed, but the travel portals are now negotiating with only four (and soon, possibly three) parent companies. One way to give some balance against a potential oligopoly is to expand access to smaller companies.
Pushing more customers to book directly has always been a goal, but the real goal is to reduce distribution costs. Presence on a travel portal can also act as a marketing venue to put the supplier's name in front of the consumer. The customer now may be interested in looking closer at that car rental firm by going to the rental company's own Web site. So whether through Google or other search engines, traditional advertising, or presence on a travel portal, there is still going to be a cost to bring the unmanaged traveler to the RAC's Web site for the first time.
ARN: But the consumer likes being able to compare rates in a matrix, so that won't go away, right? How might that matrix change?
MEW: A Google search may someday provide that information directly. In the meantime, there are meta-search engines like Kayak. They don't use a matrix per se, but the pricing comes directly from the supplier's Web site, allowing the consumer to compare rates from multiple Web sites at one time. Increasingly, though, a lot of the pricing on meta-search engines is being provided by various travel portals in addition to the suppliers themselves. The consumer gets the price comparison, but suppliers don't necessarily get the reservation directly and therefore the lower distribution cost.
The matrix displays may be good for price comparisons, but they don't do a great job of showing product differentiation. Air transactions show nonstop flights versus multiple stops, but there isn't any differentiation on baggage fees and priority boarding. The car rental matrix displays different car classes, but does not, for example, show if ancillary electives such as loss damage waivers or additional drivers are included in the rate, or if there is a discount for prepayment. These features may be incorporated into the matrix in the future.