Supreme Court Leans Toward Protecting Drivers in Rental Case

The U.S. Supreme Court. Photo via Pixabay
The U.S. Supreme Court. Photo via Pixabay

The Supreme Court appeared to lean in favor of upholding privacy rights for people not listed as authorized drivers on rental car agreements after a case hearing Tuesday.

The case involves Terrence Byrd, who was pulled over by a Pennsylvania state trooper in 2014. Byrd was driving a rental car from Budget, signed under his fiancee's name. Because Byrd was not authorized to drive the vehicle, the officer searched the car, finding 49 bricks of heroin.

Several Supreme Court justices echoed sentiments that while an unlisted driver may breach the conditions of a rental agreement, even if the listed person gives permission to the driver, that does not necessarily mean that the police may search a rental vehicle without the driver's consent.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor said that allowing police to search rental vehicles with unlisted drivers would subject all rental cars to a stop without probable cause.

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. noted that renters giving others permission to drive a rental vehicle was not particularly unusual. Some justices also said that other violations of a rental agreement do not result in a driver forfeiting constitutional protections.

Justice Anthony M. Kennedy argued that Byrd made a decision to remain off the listing, and that Byrd's fiancee put her name on the agreement so Byrd would not be tied to the vehicle.

The justices discussed whether it would have made a difference if Budget included a provision stating that unlisted drivers may be subjected to searches by law enforcement. Robert M. Loeb, Byrd's lawyer, said that the trooper may have had the authority if he had contacted Budget and the company gave permission to search the vehicle.

Justice Stephen G. Breyer suggested that the Fourth Amendment protections remain for any unlisted driver, provided that the driver has not stolen the vehicle or committed a crime by driving it.

The Supreme Court did not indicate a timeline for its final ruling in the case.


  1. Phil [ January 11, 2018 @ 01:09AM ]

    Well done State Trooper another barrow load of drugs stopped from running more young lives, bureaucrats need to take a long look at yourselves in that self righteous mirror, In the UK only listed names on the hire companies insurance are allowed to drive if the fiancé (accomplice) failed to name the criminal on the list then she should stand as guilty as the criminal for aiding and abetting.

    Americans so up tight with protectionism and rights, an honest person has nothing to hide, a savy criminal uses every angle of our political correctness....

Comment On This Story

Comment: (Max. 10000 characters)  
Please leave blank:
* Please note that every comment is moderated.


Newsletter: Sign up to receive latest news, articles, and much more.

Read the latest

Auto Focus Blog: A blog covering fleets, auto rental and the business of cars

Another Ridiculous “Used Fleet Vehicle” Scandal

While media reports concentrate on the sting and the “outrage,” where’s the empirical evidence that fleet vehicles are less mechanically sound than vehicles sold from private owners?

Will IoT Herald a New Era in Fleet Efficiency?

With the ELD rule finally in effect, small fleet operators need to hunt for new efficiencies. In transportation logistics, Internet of Things (IoT) systems could have similar lasting impacts as telematics.

Will Cars Become Transportation Appliances?

The cars are still the stars, but this year’s L.A. Auto Show revealed an auto industry at a crossroads.

Job Finder: Access Top Talent. Fill Key Positions.