Florida Federal Court Upholds Graves Amendment

A U. S. District Court in Ocala held that the Graves Amendment pre-empted all Florida vicarious liability actions against rental vehicle owners.

The court held that the $100/300/500,000 cap on liability damages was not a “financial responsibility law” that would have exempted it from the Graves Amendment, and that the Graves Amendment was not unconstitutional because car rental activity fell squarely within the activities that the U.S. Congress has the power to regulate under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution.

The case is entitled Garcia v. Vanguard Car Rental USA, Inc., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15335 (U. S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Ocala Division, March 5, 2007).

The Court noted in its lengthy opinion that “This is an important case of first impression. No other Federal Court has analyzed the preemptive scope of the Graves Amendment.”

Comment On This Story

Name:  
Email:  
Comment: (Max. 10000 characters)  
Please leave blank:
* Please note that every comment is moderated.

 
 

Newsletter: Sign up to receive latest news, articles, and much more.

Read the latest

Auto Focus Blog: A blog covering fleets, auto rental and the business of cars

6 Takeaways from the 2018 International Car Rental Show

Technological solutions are finally moving from reality to theory, peer-to-peer platforms are being redefined, China has the biggest room for growth, while Sixt’s U.S. aspirations have only just begun.

The Irony of Customer Service in the Digital Age

Sure, any company would jump at the chance to use technology to reduce labor costs. But it also comes with some big, red, flashing warning lights.

Market Forces Driving Car Rental in 2018

An analysis of the conference calls of Avis Budget Group and Hertz Global Holdings reveal trends and initiatives involving fleet right sizing, pricing, ancillary revenue opportunities, and renting to ride-hailing drivers.

Job Finder: Access Top Talent. Fill Key Positions.

>