The ruling stems from a 2018 lawsuit regarding Turo’s San Francisco International Airport (SFO) operations and the collection of the airport’s permit fees.
The passenger claims the Thrifty location serving Charleston County, S.C. rented the car without properly verifying the identity of the renter.
David Purinton, who filed the case as the owner of Subrogation Division, Inc. (SDI), explains how the decision upholds the Graves Amendment in a primary insurance state and that car rental companies can seek recovery even if they initially pay the claim.
The ruling in SDI v. Brown confirms that even in “primary” insurance states, rental car companies are not responsible for damages their renters cause.
Earlier this month, Executive filed a lawsuit alleging a consultant for Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel's campaign extorted the car rental company's owner.
Executive Car Rental is alleging that an IT consultant demanded money from the company in exchange for influence over an on-going investigation.
Europcar admitted it charged Mastercard and Visa users more than was needed to process their payments.
Consumer watchdog groups have identified more than 100 cases of Kia models catching fire.
A case brought against Uber by Los Angeles-based Diva Limousine argues that Uber's business model — as it pertains to drivers — financially harms its competitors.
In the lawsuit, Massport claims that despite sending the California-based company two cease-and-desist letters, Turo has refused to stop its airport operations.
media brand
The secure and easy all-access connection to your content.
Bookmarked content can then be accessed anytime on all of your logged in devices!
Already a member? Log In
