We believe our scenario analysis for potential profitability improvements contains a number of assumptions that may or may not be precisely accurate for each company; however, we believe our analysis is directionally accurate and demonstrates that savings for car rental companies can be meaningful.
The first chart illustrates our view on the cost of no-shows for Avis Budget and the potential profitability improvements the company can achieve by eliminating these reservations. Additionally, we provide an analysis of the profitability impact of reducing no-shows to approximately 5 percent of reservations and charging the consumer for the first day of his or her rental.
We estimate that no-shows cost Avis Budget $5 million to $9 million annually (approximately $0.03 to $0.05 in earnings per share). We believe by implementing a reservation policy that would charge consumers who do not pick up their reserved vehicle for the first day of a rental, Avis Budget would be able to recoup this expense.
The second part of the analysis attempts to quantify the financial impact if no-shows fell to 5 percent of transactions and Avis Budget was able to charge a rental fee to the consumer for the first day of his or her reservation.
Our analysis suggests that Avis Budget could generate profits of approximately $0.06 to $0.13 in incremental earnings.
Improvements in Utilization
Additionally, outside of the hard cost associated with no-shows, car rental companies could also pull other levers to improve profitability if the industry implemented a no-show policy. We believe that by reducing no-shows, car rental operators could modestly improve utilization at some level and potentially generate additional revenue ahead of the reservation costs.
The “Utilization Profitability Impact” chart illustrates the impact of a 1 percent change in vehicle utilization for Avis Budget Group, Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group and Hertz.
Fighting No-Shows Can Improve Cost Structure
Over the past 12 months, car rental companies have implemented a number of initiatives to improve profitability; we believe that in the months to come, the industry will continue to demonstrate this same commitment to profitability improvements. We applaud Avis Budget’s decision to take the first step in what we believe will move the industry toward implementing consistent reservation policies surrounding no-shows.
Based on our discussion with industry participants, we are optimistic that other car rental operators will likely follow Avis in implementing similar policies in 2010. By reducing no-shows or recouping the costs associated with rental no-shows, car rental companies can further improve their respective cost structures.
We believe charging customers a fee for reserving a vehicle and not showing up for the rental is the only way for car rental companies to cover the cost incurred by GDS providers who charge rental companies a fee for every reservation created. In our opinion, implementing a no-show fee or charging consumers for the first day of a reservation is no different than other policies currently in place by airlines and hotels.
Our thesis remains that car rental companies are operating their business for profits and not market share gains. We believe car rental companies are increasing price, closing underperforming locations, and shrinking their fleets ahead of declining industry rental volumes. We believe price increases and rationalization of the cost structure accompanied by lower vehicle depreciation expense should allow car rental companies to post profitability improvement in 2010.
John Healy covers the car rental sector within his Business Services area of focus for Northcoast Research.