Car-Sharing Company Folds after Major Vehicle Theft

HiGear, a peer-to-peer, luxury car-sharing company in San Francisco, announced this week that it is shutting down after four vehicles were stolen from customers, according to TechCrunch.com.

The company model required background and license checks, and then owners physically handed over their keys to renters after checking the license. This method did not, however, prevent from identity fraud.

Though the company had recently expanded to Los Angeles and was planning an expansion to Portland and San Diego, the company wrote in an email to its customers:

“Last month 4 cars were stolen on HiGear by a criminal ring. The total value of these cars was around $300,000. While our insurance is processing the claims for reimbursement, and the police have since recovered some of these cars, this incident involved sophisticated criminals using identity theft, stolen credit cards and stolen IDs to bypass all the background checks that we had put in place. This incident exposed us to the worst-case risks inherent in our service. Even by improving security and processes, we are not completely sure we can prevent an incident of this sort from happening again given the peer-to-peer nature of our service. It is difficult to eliminate identity fraud completely on the internet. Companies like Amazon, Google and Ebay lose millions each year because of it. However when you compound that with the sum of large losses (the average HiGear car is worth $70,000), it creates an untenable situation.”

The luxury car-sharing service reported that it had around 5,000 members and 300 cars listed. For the full article from TechCrunch, click on the URL: http://techcrunch.com/2012/01/01/luxury-car-sharing-service-higear-shuts-down-due-to-theft/

Go to www.higear.com to see the company website, which is still live.

Comments

  1. Col Bill [ January 4, 2012 @ 03:19PM ]

    Another KOOKY LIBERAL idea from san francisco.

  2. Adam B [ January 5, 2012 @ 07:18AM ]

    What insurance companies think that underwriting peer-to-peer car sharing makes any sense?

  3. Aaron M [ January 9, 2012 @ 07:56PM ]

    Thats a shame when things like that happen. Peer-to-Peer is my business. For vehicles in the $70,000 price range, the name of the game is GPS tracking. A real device and a decoy.

Comment On This Story

Name:  
Email:  
Comment: (Max. 10000 characters)  
Please leave blank:
* Please note that every comment is moderated.

Newsletter: Sign up to receive latest news, articles, and much more.

Read the latest

Auto Focus Blog: A blog covering fleets, auto rental and the business of cars

Why Do We Visit Capitol Hill?

Members of the American Car Rental Association met with U.S. senators, representatives, and their aides last week. Here’s why bringing the message to this forum matters.

The Customer Isn’t Always Right

Not caving to a customer with a blatant agenda may have consequences, especially for a small rental company that relies on stellar Yelp ratings to advertise. But business integrity must prevail.

The Truth Behind Compact Van Depreciation

Why are large van values holding up better than their compact counterparts, and will it last?

Job Finder: Access Top Talent. Fill Key Positions.