Car-Sharing Company Folds after Major Vehicle Theft

HiGear, a peer-to-peer, luxury car-sharing company in San Francisco, announced this week that it is shutting down after four vehicles were stolen from customers, according to TechCrunch.com.

The company model required background and license checks, and then owners physically handed over their keys to renters after checking the license. This method did not, however, prevent from identity fraud.

Though the company had recently expanded to Los Angeles and was planning an expansion to Portland and San Diego, the company wrote in an email to its customers:

“Last month 4 cars were stolen on HiGear by a criminal ring. The total value of these cars was around $300,000. While our insurance is processing the claims for reimbursement, and the police have since recovered some of these cars, this incident involved sophisticated criminals using identity theft, stolen credit cards and stolen IDs to bypass all the background checks that we had put in place. This incident exposed us to the worst-case risks inherent in our service. Even by improving security and processes, we are not completely sure we can prevent an incident of this sort from happening again given the peer-to-peer nature of our service. It is difficult to eliminate identity fraud completely on the internet. Companies like Amazon, Google and Ebay lose millions each year because of it. However when you compound that with the sum of large losses (the average HiGear car is worth $70,000), it creates an untenable situation.”

The luxury car-sharing service reported that it had around 5,000 members and 300 cars listed. For the full article from TechCrunch, click on the URL: http://techcrunch.com/2012/01/01/luxury-car-sharing-service-higear-shuts-down-due-to-theft/

Go to www.higear.com to see the company website, which is still live.

Comments

  1. Col Bill [ January 4, 2012 @ 03:19PM ]

    Another KOOKY LIBERAL idea from san francisco.

  2. Adam B [ January 5, 2012 @ 07:18AM ]

    What insurance companies think that underwriting peer-to-peer car sharing makes any sense?

  3. Aaron M [ January 9, 2012 @ 07:56PM ]

    Thats a shame when things like that happen. Peer-to-Peer is my business. For vehicles in the $70,000 price range, the name of the game is GPS tracking. A real device and a decoy.

Comment On This Story

Name:  
Email:  
Comment: (Max. 10000 characters)  
Please leave blank:
* Please note that every comment is moderated.

 
 

Newsletter: Sign up to receive latest news, articles, and much more.

Read the latest

Auto Focus Blog: A blog covering fleets, auto rental and the business of cars

Understanding The Fleetification of Everything

As fleet miles increase exponentially, and as new stratum of fleet enter both consumer and business use cases, the "founding fathers" who gathered at Fleet Forward in Miami last week have some work to do.

The Problem with Valuing Safety Technology

As advanced safety technologies have migrated to mainstream vehicles, retaining value for these options at resale remains an issue.

ELD Mandate: Is Your Head Still in the Sand?

If you think you have 11 weeks to implement an Electronic Logging Device system to meet the Dec. 18 compliance deadline, you really don’t — for a few reasons.

Job Finder: Access Top Talent. Fill Key Positions.

>