Oregon Supreme Court Upholds Right to Collect Diminished Value
The Oregon Supreme Court on Oct. 23 upheld an Appeals Court decision and ruled in favor of an auto policyholder who argued that his insurance company should pay not only for repairs, but also for the loss in value his vehicle suffered as a result of an accident.
The Oregon Supreme Court on Oct. 23 upheld an Appeals Court decision and ruled in favor of an auto policyholder who argued that his insurance company should pay not only for repairs, but also for the loss in value his vehicle suffered as a result of an accident.
The decision cited an earlier case finding that if repairs to a vehicle fail to restore the vehicle to its condition before the accident, then the correct measure of damages is "the difference between the fair cash value of the automobile before and after the collision."
The lead plaintiff, Jose Gonzales, was involved in an accident in 1998 that damaged his 1993 Ford pickup truck, which was insured by Farmers Insurance. Farmers paid the $6,993.40 repair costs, minus the deductible. Gonzales demanded that Farmers compensate him for the diminished value of the vehicle. However, the insurance company refused, arguing that it was responsible only for the cost of repairs.
Gonzales and another individual brought a class-action suit against Farmers in 1999, alleging that the auto insurance policy required Farmers to restore the vehicle to its pre-loss condition and to pay for diminished value. Farmers moved for summary judgment, arguing that the policy didn’t cover diminished value. The trial court agreed with Farmers and granted its motion.
Gonzales appealed the trial court decision, arguing that Oregon precedent required an auto insurer to fully repair a damaged vehicle and pay for any remaining diminished value, unless the insurance policy expressly excluded such coverage. This appeal cited two cases decided by the Oregon Supreme Court more than 60 years ago. The Court of Appeals ruled in favor of Gonzales -- a decision that the Supreme Court affirmed.
Much of the case focused on the true meaning of the word "repair," as it appeared in the policy.
The Supreme Court decision applies to insurance policies that do not explicitly exclude payment of diminished value.
Gonzales' attorney, Dan Gatti, told the Oregonian newspaper that his law firm also has class-action cases pending against three other major insurance companies -– Allstate, State Farm and Progressive – seeking payment for diminished value.
To access the court decision document, click here.
More Rental Operations

Direct, Broker or Hybrid? How Travel Retailers Source Rental Cars
As travel retailers weigh direct supplier relationships against third-party distribution, rental operators need to understand how those decisions affect their business.
Read More →
How Did This Independent Rental Operator Grow to 170 Vehicles in 4 Years?
With 170 vehicles across three Kentucky locations, Joel Price relies on an overseas team to handle reservations, payments, and after-hours customer service. It's one part of an unconventional approach to growing an independent rental operation.
Read More →
What Does It Take to Succeed in B2B Rentals?
The fundamentals may be familiar to daily car rental operators, but project-based truck rentals put different demands on the fleet and the business.
Read More →
NPR Builds on International Partnerships to Grow Rental Bookings
With Ana Laborde supporting broker development, NPR Auto Group is tailoring distribution strategies, rate packages, and partnerships to grow international reservations across its three brands.
Read More →
Advantage, Sixt Place Among Top Five in Annual Satisfaction Study
While Enterprise and National retain the top spots in JD Power’s 2026 rankings, the latest customer satisfaction results suggest renters can find competitive service beyond the biggest car rental names.
Read More →
The $100,000 Insurance Trap in Exotic Car Rentals
Exotic rental agencies often rely on customers’ personal auto policies to protect six-figure vehicles. But policy language can dramatically change the coverage for vehicles over $100,000 MSRP.
Read More →
The Booking Is Confirmed, But Is Your Customer Ready to Drive?
For international renters, a confirmed reservation doesn’t always mean they’re eligible to drive. Earlier checks can help operators catch documentation and payment issues before the customer reaches the counter.
Read More →
ICRS 2027 Opens Call for Papers
The International Car Rental Show seeks session proposals on the business, operational, and technology issues facing car rental operators. Submissions are due Jan. 15.
Read More →
Turo to Launch Vehicle Delivery Service
Turo Delivered will let travelers search for vehicles that hosts can deliver directly to hotels, homes, airports, train stations, and other locations.
Read More →
Palm Beach Airport Code Change Creates Car Rental Distribution Gap
A test of rental searches under the old PBI and new DJT airport codes returned largely different sets of brands and vehicles, highlighting a potential distribution problem for rental operators.
Read More →
