Oregon Supreme Court Upholds Right to Collect Diminished Value
The Oregon Supreme Court on Oct. 23 upheld an Appeals Court decision and ruled in favor of an auto policyholder who argued that his insurance company should pay not only for repairs, but also for the loss in value his vehicle suffered as a result of an accident.
The Oregon Supreme Court on Oct. 23 upheld an Appeals Court decision and ruled in favor of an auto policyholder who argued that his insurance company should pay not only for repairs, but also for the loss in value his vehicle suffered as a result of an accident.
The decision cited an earlier case finding that if repairs to a vehicle fail to restore the vehicle to its condition before the accident, then the correct measure of damages is "the difference between the fair cash value of the automobile before and after the collision."
The lead plaintiff, Jose Gonzales, was involved in an accident in 1998 that damaged his 1993 Ford pickup truck, which was insured by Farmers Insurance. Farmers paid the $6,993.40 repair costs, minus the deductible. Gonzales demanded that Farmers compensate him for the diminished value of the vehicle. However, the insurance company refused, arguing that it was responsible only for the cost of repairs.
Gonzales and another individual brought a class-action suit against Farmers in 1999, alleging that the auto insurance policy required Farmers to restore the vehicle to its pre-loss condition and to pay for diminished value. Farmers moved for summary judgment, arguing that the policy didn’t cover diminished value. The trial court agreed with Farmers and granted its motion.
Gonzales appealed the trial court decision, arguing that Oregon precedent required an auto insurer to fully repair a damaged vehicle and pay for any remaining diminished value, unless the insurance policy expressly excluded such coverage. This appeal cited two cases decided by the Oregon Supreme Court more than 60 years ago. The Court of Appeals ruled in favor of Gonzales -- a decision that the Supreme Court affirmed.
Much of the case focused on the true meaning of the word "repair," as it appeared in the policy.
The Supreme Court decision applies to insurance policies that do not explicitly exclude payment of diminished value.
Gonzales' attorney, Dan Gatti, told the Oregonian newspaper that his law firm also has class-action cases pending against three other major insurance companies -– Allstate, State Farm and Progressive – seeking payment for diminished value.
To access the court decision document, click here.
More Rental Operations

Advantage, Sixt Place Among Top Five in Annual Satisfaction Study
While Enterprise and National retain the top spots in JD Power’s 2026 rankings, the latest customer satisfaction results suggest renters can find competitive service beyond the biggest car rental names.
Read More →
The $100,000 Insurance Trap in Exotic Car Rentals
Exotic rental agencies often rely on customers’ personal auto policies to protect six-figure vehicles. But policy language can dramatically change the coverage for vehicles over $100,000 MSRP.
Read More →
The Booking Is Confirmed, But Is Your Customer Ready to Drive?
For international renters, a confirmed reservation doesn’t always mean they’re eligible to drive. Earlier checks can help operators catch documentation and payment issues before the customer reaches the counter.
Read More →
ICRS 2027 Opens Call for Papers
The International Car Rental Show seeks session proposals on the business, operational, and technology issues facing car rental operators. Submissions are due Jan. 15.
Read More →
Turo to Launch Vehicle Delivery Service
Turo Delivered will let travelers search for vehicles that hosts can deliver directly to hotels, homes, airports, train stations, and other locations.
Read More →
Palm Beach Airport Code Change Creates Car Rental Distribution Gap
A test of rental searches under the old PBI and new DJT airport codes returned largely different sets of brands and vehicles, highlighting a potential distribution problem for rental operators.
Read More →
U-Save Continues Dominican Republic Expansion with Launch in Punta Cana
The new franchise location builds on U-Save’s existing Santo Domingo operation and will begin taking reservations for October 2026.
Read More →
When AI Books the Rental Car, Who Controls the Sale?
As AI moves from comparing rental rates to completing transactions, operators need to understand how travelers find, interpret, rank, and ultimately see their offers. (Part 2 of 2.)
Read More →
European Booked Car Rental Rates Fell 5%, Results Varied by Country
Ireland, Cyprus, and the United Kingdom saw steep declines, while booked rates rose in Poland and Hungary.
Read More →Is It Time to Rethink Rental Categories?
As traditional economy and compact cars disappear from the market, longtime rental operator Mike DeLorenzo asks whether the industry’s familiar vehicle categories still make sense — and what operators need to rethink along with them.
Read More →
