Enterprise Agrees to N.Y. Refunds of $2 Million
ALBANY, N.Y. -- Enterprise Rent-A-Car has agreed to refund approximately $2 million to consumers who purchased supplementary liability protection (SLP) in the state of New York during a five-mon...
ALBANY, N.Y. -- Enterprise Rent-A-Car has agreed to refund approximately $2 million to consumers who purchased supplementary liability protection (SLP) in the state of New York during a five-month period in 2001.
In addition, Enterprise will pay $200,000 in costs to the state. The company's consent to a court order for refunds follows three years of litigation with the New York attorney general's office. However, the company continues to deny that it ever violated New York state law or deceived customers.
In a lawsuit originally filed in May 2000, Attorney General Eliot Spitzer alleged that Enterprise had failed to provide its customers with the minimum liability coverage required by state law. The minimum amount of personal liabiity coverage is $25,000 to $50,000 for bodily injury, $50,000 to $100,000 for death, and $10,000 for property damage.
Spitzer's lawsuit argued that instead of providing the state-mandated insurance coverage, Enterprise would sue its renters to recover any liability incurred by the company as the vehicle owner.
Further, Spitzer alleged, by informing customers that the company provided no insurance, Enterprise prompted more customers to purchase supplemental liability protection at an extra cost of $6.95 to $7.95 per day. The SLP provides consumers with $1 million in extra coverage.
"This litigation resulted in a significant change in the practices of this rental car company that benefits consumers," Spitzer said. "The court order compensates consumers who were deceived into purchasing liability insurance through Enterprise even after the state's highest court held that rental car companies are required by law to provide coverage for their renters."
However, Enterprise denies any wrongdoing. The dispute, Enterprise said, stems from an April 2001 change in state law. During the months following the change, Enterprise continued to use its pre-existing rental contracts but added an addendum that provided the coverage information required under the newly changed law.
"We still maintain that our approach to implementing the required contract change was timely and responsible," said Andy Church, Enterprise's New York group vice president and general manager. "But we understand and accept the state's viewpoint and have agreed to refund a portion of the SLP cost to any customer who purchased SLP from us in New York during that five-month period."
Enterprise Rent-A-Car estimated that approximately 100,000 customers purchased SLP in New York during the period in question, April through August of 2001. The refund will average $20 per customer.
"We made an administrative decision to implement our contract addendum on a timely basis," Church said. "The attorney general took exception to our decision, and we felt the refund was a pragmatic and cost-effective course of action for us. We do not, however, agree with the attorney general nor are we admitting to any wrongdoing."
Enterprise said it expects to mail refunds within 60 days from the date of the settlement agreement, dated July 17.
More Rental Operations

What Does It Take to Succeed in B2B Rentals?
The fundamentals may be familiar to daily car rental operators, but project-based truck rentals put different demands on the fleet and the business.
Read More →
NPR Builds on International Partnerships to Grow Rental Bookings
With Ana Laborde supporting broker development, NPR Auto Group is tailoring distribution strategies, rate packages, and partnerships to grow international reservations across its three brands.
Read More →
Advantage, Sixt Place Among Top Five in Annual Satisfaction Study
While Enterprise and National retain the top spots in JD Power’s 2026 rankings, the latest customer satisfaction results suggest renters can find competitive service beyond the biggest car rental names.
Read More →
The $100,000 Insurance Trap in Exotic Car Rentals
Exotic rental agencies often rely on customers’ personal auto policies to protect six-figure vehicles. But policy language can dramatically change the coverage for vehicles over $100,000 MSRP.
Read More →
The Booking Is Confirmed, But Is Your Customer Ready to Drive?
For international renters, a confirmed reservation doesn’t always mean they’re eligible to drive. Earlier checks can help operators catch documentation and payment issues before the customer reaches the counter.
Read More →
ICRS 2027 Opens Call for Papers
The International Car Rental Show seeks session proposals on the business, operational, and technology issues facing car rental operators. Submissions are due Jan. 15.
Read More →
Turo to Launch Vehicle Delivery Service
Turo Delivered will let travelers search for vehicles that hosts can deliver directly to hotels, homes, airports, train stations, and other locations.
Read More →
Palm Beach Airport Code Change Creates Car Rental Distribution Gap
A test of rental searches under the old PBI and new DJT airport codes returned largely different sets of brands and vehicles, highlighting a potential distribution problem for rental operators.
Read More →
U-Save Continues Dominican Republic Expansion with Launch in Punta Cana
The new franchise location builds on U-Save’s existing Santo Domingo operation and will begin taking reservations for October 2026.
Read More →
When AI Books the Rental Car, Who Controls the Sale?
As AI moves from comparing rental rates to completing transactions, operators need to understand how travelers find, interpret, rank, and ultimately see their offers. (Part 2 of 2.)
Read More →
