-  Photo courtesy of Rent Centric.

Photo courtesy of Rent Centric. 

It’s been awhile since a leader in the car rental industry has defined the negative financial impact the explosion of the Transportation Network Company (TNC) model has caused on its business.

Yet Hertz Global Holdings’ CEO Kathryn Marinello did just that on questioning during the company’s first quarter conference call. She labeled TNC’s original impact as a “mid-to-high single-digit erosion of our business.”

The erosion was primarily short-term rentals, she said, “which frankly aren’t that great for us,” because of the costs to turn the vehicles. This is generally in line with statements Avis Budget Group and other industry watchers have made before, though I’ve heard “mid-to-low” single digits.

Hertz can probably feel comfortable making that statement because it’s realized, ironically, a new business sector in the last couple of years — renting to TNC drivers. Marinello said that renting to Uber and Lyft has replaced Hertz’s revenue erosion from TNC competition, and then some.

Avis Budget Group, too, has finally gotten into the TNC rentals game, though with much smaller numbers. The company has partnered with Lyft to rent about 1,500 cars in three pilot cities with more to follow this year. The platform is integrated into the Lyft driver app, allowing for an on-demand transaction.

Hertz earned nearly $300 million in TNC revenue in 2018 on 42,000 cars dedicated to that market. Back-of-the-napkin math puts revenue per unit (RPU) at about $600 per month.

That’s not disappointing when considering the lower cost structure in the model: Instead of selling 18-month old units with 40,000 miles, Avis and Hertz “cascade” them to the TNC market and sell them at about 80,000 miles. In this band, depreciation isn’t as steep, resulting in lower per-mile fleet costs.

The Avis cars are connected, meaning Avis is watching them closely to manage mileage. Further, Hertz is refining its model, and according to CFO Jamere Jackson on the call, has recently driven “about a mid-single digit increase in RPD (revenue per day) on our TNC business.”

As TNC grows — and it looks like there is still more TNC penetration to be taken in the coming years — you’d think car rental volume would have taken a commensurable hit. This hasn’t been the case, if these two public companies are worthy barometers.

In 2018, Avis increased rental volumes 1% in “Americas” (U.S. and Latin America) compared to 2017. In the first quarter of 2019 Avis saw 1% lower rental volumes in Americas (the government shutdown played a role) though it is forecasting an “unchanged to up 2%” for the year.  

Hertz had significant volume growth in 2018, some of that admittedly due to its own growth in TNC rentals and some perhaps due to taking back share. This growth continued into the first quarter of 2019.

We all know what has happened to the taxi industry in the past eight years. So, we should ask ourselves: Absent the existence of the TNC phenomenon, would the car rental industry have experienced a flood of additive volume these past few years? It’s hard to say, as nothing exists in a vacuum.

But let’s not forget that the U.S. is the most mature of any car rental market. It has longstanding competitive pressures and some new ones (read: Sixt).

Let’s also keep in mind that both Uber and Lyft are self-sustaining because they’ve raised so much capital — they can continue to subsidize every transaction in ways that incumbent car rental never could. Investors have enough faith in the business model that they let Lyft accrue a staggering $2.4 billion in operating losses over the last three years.

While Hertz and Avis have been pressured for generations to show profitability, Uber and Lyft are only beginning to face these pressures now. In typical (but revealing) “investor speak,” Lyft claims in its IPO paperwork that “it may never be profitable.”

The TNC market itself will face its own disruption. When personal car ownership erodes, will Uber and Lyft and the rest of the gig economy face a smaller market for drivers? At the very least, some entity will still need to put those drivers in cars.

This is an exciting market, and we all felt this this energy at the International Car Rental Show in April. Car rental is — and always will be — about personal mobility. The way we get around will change yet again, but car rental is poised to meet these new demands.

Related: Mobility and Car Rental: Six Near-Term Trends

About the author
Chris Brown

Chris Brown

Associate Publisher

As associate publisher of Automotive Fleet, Auto Rental News, and Fleet Forward, Chris Brown covers all aspects of fleets, transportation, and mobility.

View Bio
0 Comments